--- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-22 22:33 ---
Fixed on trunk.
Note, this patch does not fix the enormous compile times needed
on code with such outlandish data statements.
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-22 22:10 ---
Subject: Bug 31244
Author: kargl
Date: Mon Oct 22 22:10:42 2007
New Revision: 129561
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129561
Log:
2007-10-22 Steven G. Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fort
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-19 18:48 ---
I have a patch that in theory allows the repeat count
to be unlimited. I'll note that having a large repeat
count is a rather illogical thing to do, based on my
previous posts about compile time and size of executable
--- Comment #5 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2007-09-18 20:07 ---
Subject: Re: data initialization with more than 2**32 elements
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 07:26:22PM -, sgk at troutmask dot apl dot
washington dot edu wrote:
>
> If I'm not mistaken, this will
--- Comment #4 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2007-09-18 19:26 ---
Subject: Re: data initialization with more than 2**32 elements
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 07:16:42PM -, sgk at troutmask dot apl dot
washington dot edu wrote:
>
> Ugh. I have a patch that would
--- Comment #3 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2007-09-18 19:16 ---
Subject: Re: data initialization with more than 2**32 elements
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 06:02:03PM -, sgk at troutmask dot apl dot
washington dot edu wrote:
> >
> > The problem is found in dec
--- Comment #2 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2007-09-18 18:02 ---
Subject: Re: data initialization with more than 2**32 elements
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 05:56:36PM -, kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> The problem is found in decl.c(top_val_list) at li
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-18 17:56 ---
confirmed.
The problem is found in decl.c(top_val_list) at lines 404-411, which
are
signed int tmp;
msg = gfc_extract_int (expr, &tmp);
gfc_free_expr (expr);
if (msg != NULL)
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last recon
