--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-24 14:17 ---
Subject: Bug 31215
Author: pault
Date: Sat Mar 24 14:17:34 2007
New Revision: 123184
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123184
Log:
2007-03-24 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-24 13:57 ---
Fixed on trunk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-24 12:31 ---
Subject: Bug 31215
Author: pault
Date: Sat Mar 24 12:30:58 2007
New Revision: 123183
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=123183
Log:
2007-03-24 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-20 10:09 ---
> > All compilers I know reject this code, except g95. The list includes Lahey,
> > which is a reason for me to doubt whether this code is legal or not.
The code is legal because the interface to test2 only needs the
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-16 15:56 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> All compilers I know reject this code, except g95. The list includes Lahey,
> which is a reason for me to doubt whether this code is legal or not.
NAG f95 and g95 compile it and output:
21
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-16 15:37
---
All compilers I know reject this code, except g95. The list includes Lahey,
which is a reason for me to doubt whether this code is legal or not.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31215
