[Bug fortran/31205] aliased operator assignment produces wrong result

2007-07-24 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-24 19:19 --- Fixed on trunk. Thanks, Joost. Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/31205] aliased operator assignment produces wrong result

2007-07-24 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-24 19:16 --- Subject: Bug 31205 Author: pault Date: Tue Jul 24 19:16:36 2007 New Revision: 126886 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126886 Log: 2007-07-24 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/31

[Bug fortran/31205] aliased operator assignment produces wrong result

2007-07-24 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-24 19:15 --- Subject: Bug 31205 Author: pault Date: Tue Jul 24 19:15:27 2007 New Revision: 126885 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126885 Log: 2007-07-24 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/31

[Bug fortran/31205] aliased operator assignment produces wrong result

2007-07-24 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #7 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-07-24 07:55 --- Subject: Bug number PR31205 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-07/msg01709.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug fortran/31205] aliased operator assignment produces wrong result

2007-06-30 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #6 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-06-30 16:19 --- Subject: Bug number PR31205 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-06/msg02151.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug fortran/31205] aliased operator assignment produces wrong result

2007-06-28 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-28 08:04 --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > This is related to PR 14771, most likely the parentheses are being ignored. > The parentheses are being ignored - in fact they disappear completely; I > presume t

[Bug fortran/31205] aliased operator assignment produces wrong result

2007-06-27 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-27 15:56 --- (In reply to comment #2) > This is related to PR 14771, most likely the parentheses are being ignored. The parentheses are being ignored - in fact they disappear completely; I presume that gfc_simplify_expr is the cul

[Bug fortran/31205] aliased operator assignment produces wrong result

2007-04-15 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-15 18:39 --- Minimal example: program test implicit none type data_type integer :: i=2 end type data_type type(data_type) :: d d%i = 4 call set(d,d) contains subroutine set(x1,x2) type(data_type),intent(out)

[Bug fortran/31205] aliased operator assignment produces wrong result

2007-03-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-17 07:38 --- This is related to PR 14771, most likely the parentheses are being ignored. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31205

[Bug fortran/31205] aliased operator assignment produces wrong result

2007-03-16 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-17 07:26 --- The aliasing of the arguments to subroutine set results in the initialization of the intent(out) also being applied to the intent(in) argument. I feel a temporary coming on. Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org c