--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-07 00:04
---
Fixed on mainline.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-06 23:37
---
Subject: Bug 31201
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun May 6 22:37:27 2007
New Revision: 124481
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=124481
Log:
2007-05-06 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-06 23:32
---
Subject: Bug 31201
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun May 6 22:32:33 2007
New Revision: 124480
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=124480
Log:
2007-05-06 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-06 23:28
---
Subject: Bug 31201
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun May 6 22:28:31 2007
New Revision: 124479
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=124479
Log:
2007-05-06 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #8 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-04-14 19:15 ---
Subject: Bug number PR31201
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-04/msg00863.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #7 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-04-04 05:55 ---
Subject: Bug number PR31201
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-04/msg00126.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-03 14:50
---
I have a patch testing
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31201
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-18 02:22
---
Heres the real problem:
Try compiling this with and without -fno-range-check.
integer*8 :: k= 68719476746
integer*8 :: k2 = 2_8**36 + 10
print *, "k=",k, k2, int(k2, kind=8), int(k2, kind=4)
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-17 13:01
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> The front end is converting the integer8 to integer4 and not checking the
> range
> of the number first.
Every time a unit number is used, there should be a check to be sure it's in
th
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-17 06:28
---
The front end is converting the integer8 to integer4 and not checking the range
of the number first. The integer value gets wrapped around and the library
sees unit=10 for this test case.
--
http://gcc.gnu.o
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-16 23:01
---
I will fix this one.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
A
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-16 20:29
---
Unit numbers are passed and stored internally as GFC_INTEGER_4, but we don't
error out on too large numbers (like the one that don't fit inside a
GFC_INTEGER_4).
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
12 matches
Mail list logo
