--- Comment #12 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-12 20:46
---
Fixed.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASS
--- Comment #11 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-12 20:45
---
Subject: Bug 30964
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Sun Aug 12 20:45:29 2007
New Revision: 127383
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127383
Log:
PR fortran/30964
PR fortran/33054
--- Comment #10 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-12 16:41
---
Complete patch submitted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg00782.html
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #9 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-12 00:16
---
Haven't yet had time to regtest this patch, but it should fix the bug:
Index: trans-expr.c
===
--- trans-expr.c(revision 127363)
+++ trans-e
--- Comment #8 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-11 23:33
---
(In reply to comment #7)
> The reason for that is in gfc_trans_call
This should be: gfc_conv_function_call
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30964
--- Comment #7 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-11 23:22
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> For the first one, gfc_conv_missing_dummy() is called, which leads to correct
> code. For the second one, gfc_conv_missing_dummy() is not called, leading to
> wrong-code.
The reason for
--- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-28 20:48
---
The following two codes are handled differently:
$ cat u.f90
call foo()
contains
subroutine foo(x)
integer, dimension(:), optional :: x
interface
subroutine bar(x)
integer, dimension(:),
--- Comment #5 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-22 09:23
---
There's more to it. When generate wrong-code for optional arguments, as shown
by the following code:
$ cat b.f90
program trs
implicit none
integer :: size, ierr
integer, allocatable, dimension(:) :: seed
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-21 15:21
---
Created an attachment (id=13595)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13595&action=view)
Patch for that issue; not tested yet
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Re
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-15 12:59
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I have a patch to permit gfc_check_random_seed to deal with arguments
> with the optional attribute set. I was waiting on pault's size0/size1
> patch to hit the tree to see if it does t
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last recon
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-26 19:53 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I have a patch to permit gfc_check_random_seed to deal with arguments
> with the optional attribute set. I was waiting on pault's size0/size1
> patch to hit the tree to see if it does the
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-26 00:14 ---
I have a patch to permit gfc_check_random_seed to deal with arguments
with the optional attribute set. I was waiting on pault's size0/size1
patch to hit the tree to see if it does the right thing.
--
http://gcc.g
13 matches
Mail list logo
