--- Comment #9 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-28 18:26 ---
Fixed in GCC 4.3, not part of 4.2 => close PR.
Thanks for having reported this bug.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-28 18:17 ---
Subject: Bug 30887
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Feb 28 18:17:34 2007
New Revision: 122409
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122409
Log:
2007-02-28 Tobias Burnus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Paul
--- Comment #7 from p dot w dot draper at durham dot ac dot uk 2007-02-23
15:44 ---
Tried out the patch and it works for me under 64bit with
default sized integers. Seems to have fixed PR 30888 too.
Thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30887
--- Comment #6 from sdirkse at gams dot com 2007-02-22 21:35 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> >
> > Enough facts, now for some ignorant speculation: I suppose there is some
> > logic
> > missing to pass a value from the caller when the size of the value is not
--- Comment #5 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-02-22 21:10 ---
Subject: Bug number PR30887
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-02/msg01839.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |burnus at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-22 19:24 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
>
> Enough facts, now for some ignorant speculation: I suppose there is some logic
> missing to pass a value from the caller when the size of the value is not the
> default size (i.e. 4 for my
--- Comment #3 from sdirkse at gams dot com 2007-02-22 18:52 ---
I took out the restriction in resolve.c that leads to the error message, and it
does give me a clean compile, but the code does not do what I expect. For
example, passing a real(kind=8) by-value to C doesn't get me a good
--- Comment #2 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2007-02-21 05:16 ---
Subject: Re: %VAL only accepts default-kind integer/real/complex
Tobias,
> --- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-20 17:32
> ---
> Paul, do you remember why you have added the following
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-20 17:32 ---
Paul, do you remember why you have added the following restriction?
(The example is accepted by ifort, nagf95 and g95.)
resolve.c:
if (((e->ts.type == BT_REAL || e->ts.type == BT_COMPLEX)
10 matches
Mail list logo
