--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-11 16:17 ---
Subject: Bug 30883
Author: pault
Date: Sun Mar 11 16:17:32 2007
New Revision: 122822
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122822
Log:
2007-03-11 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #5 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-03-11 12:01 ---
Subject: Bug number PR30883
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg00651.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #4 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2007-02-20 22:56 ---
Subject: Re: procedure with dummy procedure f1 rejected with implicit none
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 10:41:11PM -, kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> I haven't located the relevant text,
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-20 22:41 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Has this been checked against comp.lang.fortran?
>
Steven,
I haven't located the relevant text, but I believe that
Joost is right. The INTERFACE defines it own scoping
unit, and the IMP
--- Comment #2 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-20 21:45 ---
Has this been checked against comp.lang.fortran?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30883
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-20 14:01 ---
gfortran rejects the procedure with:
SUBROUTINE S1(F1)
1
Error: Symbol 'f1' at (1) has no IMPLICIT type
The error goes away when the return value of f1 has a type, e.g.
INTERFACE
FUNCTION F
