--- Comment #10 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-26 21:16
---
Subject: Bug 30865
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Feb 26 21:16:00 2007
New Revision: 122342
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122342
Log:
2007-02-26 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #9 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-02-25 02:46 ---
Subject: Bug number PR 30865
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-02/msg01956.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #8 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-24 21:48 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Paul, I tried to apply your patch, but it is rejected.
I applied the patch with a recent trunk, which worked (except
I got a message that the patch file contained CR/LF).
I'm running a r
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-21 19:02 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Created an attachment (id=13073)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13073&action=view) [edit]
> Fix for the problem
>
Paul, I tried to apply your patch, but it is rejected.
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-20 17:25 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > Created an attachment (id=13073)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13073&action=view) [edit]
> > Fix for the problem
> I should have remarked th
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-20 14:39 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Created an attachment (id=13073)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13073&action=view) [edit]
> Fix for the problem
I should have remarked that the patch produces the followi
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-20 14:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=13073)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13073&action=view)
Fix for the problem
I will set this regtesting in a few minutes and will post the result. Note,
however, that I
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-20 13:16 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> For those who wonder (as I did) why using an optional argument is legal:
> It is only used as actual argument corresponding to an optional dummy
> argument. (cf. 12.4.1.6 in the Fortran 200
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-20 08:57 ---
> The following is legal but we segfault on execution:
> subroutine checkv(ires,a1,opt1)
>integer :: a1(:,:)
>integer, optional :: opt1
>ires = size (a1, dim=opt1)
For those who wonder (as I did) why us
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirm
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-20 05:34 ---
Confirmed:
The first call to checkv produces
checkv (&ires, &parm.10, 0B);
With prototype: checkv (ires, a1, opt1), the call to size1 is
*ires = _gfortran_size1 (&parm.6, *opt1);
with the obvious consequences.
11 matches
Mail list logo