--- Comment #17 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-10 22:56
---
hard_function_value returns the wrong rtl ...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30406
--- Comment #16 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-10 22:51
---
The type is correct when the decl is created:
Breakpoint 3, build_decl_stat (code=RESULT_DECL, name=0x0, type=0xb7c55384) at
../../gcc/tree.c:3250
3250 t = make_node_stat (code PASS_MEM_STAT);
(gdb) p debug_ge
--- Comment #15 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-10 09:07
---
The result decl should have a RTL of a DI mode:
unsigned ignored regdecl DI file a.f90 line 1 size unit size
align 64 context
(reg:SI 122 [ ])>
The mode of the decl is correct but the
--- Comment #14 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-10 08:11
---
In emit_move_insn, the failing assert is:
(gdb) l 3275
3270{
3271 enum machine_mode mode = GET_MODE (x);
3272 rtx y_cst = NULL_RTX;
3273 rtx last_insn, set;
3274
3275 gcc_assert (mode !=
--- Comment #13 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-10 06:43
---
$ cat > a.f90
function f(l)
logical(8) :: f
logical(8) :: l
f = .not.l
end function f
$ gfortran a.f90
a.f90: In function f:
a.f90:1: internal compiler error: in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3276
$ gfortran -v
Us
--- Comment #12 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-01-09 22:10 ---
Subject: Re: ICE in LOGICAL(8) functions
> In C (and C++) Boolean types only have one size ...
Too bad!-)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30406
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 22:08
---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Second, what is the C equivalent of logical(8)? I am wondering
> if the same ICE occurs in the equivalent C code.
In C (and C++) Boolean types only have one size, on ppc-darwin that siz
--- Comment #10 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-01-09 22:06 ---
Subject: Re: ICE in LOGICAL(8) functions
First, the crash report I have posted yesterday has nothing to do
with this bug that is really an internal compiler error (caught
within the compiler) and not a crash.
Seco
--- Comment #9 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 16:13
---
Confirmed on MacOS 10.4.8, using gfortran 4.3.0 20070102 (experimental). Cannot
do more at the moment.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #8 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-01-08 20:49 ---
Subject: Re: ICE in LOGICAL(8) functions
> Can you verify that OSX on PPC has logical(8)?
I have tested:
logical(8) :: l1, l2
l1 = .true.
l2 = .false.
print *, l1.neqv.l2, kind(l1.neqv.l2)
end
it returns
T
--- Comment #7 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2007-01-08 20:34 ---
Subject: Re: ICE in LOGICAL(8) functions
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 08:19:10PM -, dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr wrote:
>
> I got the same error with OSX 10.4, gcc version 4.2.0 20060617.
> I was
--- Comment #6 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-01-08 20:19 ---
Subject: Re: ICE in LOGICAL(8) functions
I got the same error with OSX 10.4, gcc version 4.2.0 20060617.
I was wrong in my previous mail, -fdump-tree-original gives:
f (l)
{
logical8 __result_f;
__result_f = *
--- Comment #5 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-01-08 19:05 ---
Subject: Re: ICE in LOGICAL(8) functions
> Dominique, can you post the output file created with -fdump-tree-originial.
Unfotunately I also got an ICE with -fdump-tree-original.
The crash trace gives:
0 f951
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-08 17:43 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Dominique, can you post the output file created with -fdump-tree-originial.
> Like Tobias, I can compile this without a problem. Here's my dump
> If yours is the same, we have a target spe
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-08 17:38 ---
Dominique, can you post the output file created with -fdump-tree-originial.
Like Tobias, I can compile this without a problem. Here's my dump
f (l)
{
logical8 __result_f;
__result_f = *l == 0;
return __result_
--- Comment #2 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-01-08 13:42 ---
Subject: Re: ICE in LOGICAL(8) functions
Which version of gfortran did you use and which options?
PPC OSX 10.3, version 4.3.0 20070105
Note that I did not see the ICE on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
version 4.3.0 200
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-08 13:33 ---
Which version of gfortran did you use and which options?
I cannot reproduce it with 4.3.0 20070108 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
(Thus it is either platform specific or a newer or older bug than my version.)
--
bur
17 matches
Mail list logo
