--- Comment #11 from Bil dot Kleb at NASA dot gov 2007-01-13 21:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=12902)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12902&action=view)
An excerpt from precond_turbulent.f90
Here's an excerpt from one of the offenders. Note: the module only has a
--- Comment #10 from Bil dot Kleb at NASA dot gov 2007-01-13 21:17 ---
Based on the Lakos-style analysis of the dependencies for these particular
routines, it /might/ be possible to supply self-contained source; but it will
take a while to check with the powers that be.
--
http://gc
--- Comment #9 from Bil dot Kleb at NASA dot gov 2007-01-13 21:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=12900)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12900&action=view)
Lakos-style use associations for precond_turbulent.f90
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30367
--- Comment #8 from Bil dot Kleb at NASA dot gov 2007-01-13 21:13 ---
Created an attachment (id=12899)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12899&action=view)
Lakos-style use associations for precond_turbpart.f90
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30367
--- Comment #7 from Bil dot Kleb at NASA dot gov 2007-01-13 21:13 ---
Created an attachment (id=12898)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12898&action=view)
Lakos-style use associations for residual_turbulent.f90
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30367
--- Comment #6 from Bil dot Kleb at NASA dot gov 2007-01-13 21:12 ---
Created an attachment (id=12897)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12897&action=view)
Lakos-style use associations for residual_turbpart.f90
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30367
--- Comment #5 from Bil dot Kleb at NASA dot gov 2007-01-13 21:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=12896)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12896&action=view)
Entire compilation log with -fmem-report -ftime-report turned on
The trouble routines are part of the Adjoint cod
--- Comment #4 from kargl at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2007-01-13 17:23 ---
Subject: Re: gfortran compile times excessive with
-Wall
Bil dot Kleb at NASA dot gov wrote:
>
> Gfortran's compilation time is mainly due to a three routines that take on the
> order of 1/2 h
--- Comment #3 from Bil dot Kleb at NASA dot gov 2007-01-13 12:35 ---
I've just tried to duplicate the compile time difference with -Wall and found
that the -Wall was a red herring -- it always takes 169 minutes to compile our
code with gfortran, -Wall or not.
This is about 8 times long
--- Comment #2 from Bil dot Kleb at NASA dot gov 2007-01-09 13:15 ---
No warnings with -Wall -- we've been busy cleaning the last few months.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30367
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 06:25
---
Are there a lot of warnings emitted when compiled with -Wall ? or None?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30367
11 matches
Mail list logo
