[Bug fortran/30081] Interface bug overloading random_seed, random_number

2006-12-21 Thread anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #8 from anlauf at gmx dot de 2006-12-21 08:49 --- (In reply to comment #7) Paul, a personal thanks for taking care of this one. With this patch in place, I was now able proceed compiling a major software piece just to hit the next gfc_todo (PR 30273)... Anyway, a merry x-m

[Bug fortran/30081] Interface bug overloading random_seed, random_number

2006-12-20 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-20 13:48 --- Subject: Bug 30081 Author: pault Date: Wed Dec 20 13:48:06 2006 New Revision: 120072 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120072 Log: 2006-12-20 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/

[Bug fortran/30081] Interface bug overloading random_seed, random_number

2006-12-15 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #6 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-12-16 01:40 --- Subject: Bug number PR30081 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg01147.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug fortran/30081] Interface bug overloading random_seed, random_number

2006-12-14 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-14 21:14 --- Created an attachment (id=12805) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12805&action=view) A fix for the PR that regtests OK This is the patch referred to previously. Paul -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugz

[Bug fortran/30081] Interface bug overloading random_seed, random_number

2006-12-14 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-14 21:12 --- Harald, As usual, you provide us with the good ones. This problem arises because the resolution of intrinsics, if there is no matching specific interface, has been restricted to generics only. The following effects a

[Bug fortran/30081] Interface bug overloading random_seed, random_number

2006-12-07 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-07 18:49 --- > I agree that other compilers handle this OK but is it valid? I think it is. Think of the form interface operator(=) module procedure myassign end interface here the "generic-spec" is not a "generic-name"

[Bug fortran/30081] Interface bug overloading random_seed, random_number

2006-12-07 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-07 17:28 --- Harald, I agree that other compilers handle this OK but is it valid? As far as I can tell, random_number and random_seed are specific intrinsics. What should the form be here? Thanks for keeping us on our toes! P

[Bug fortran/30081] Interface bug overloading random_seed, random_number

2006-12-06 Thread anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #1 from anlauf at gmx dot de 2006-12-06 09:12 --- Created an attachment (id=12752) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12752&action=view) Interface bug demo code -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30081