--- Comment #6 from chaoyingfu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-01 02:00
---
Subject: Bug 29806
Author: chaoyingfu
Date: Fri Dec 1 01:57:22 2006
New Revision: 119394
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=119394
Log:
Merged revisions 118791-118987 via svnmerge from
svn+
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-15 10:14 ---
Fixed in 4.3 == trunk.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
St
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-15 10:02 ---
Subject: Bug 29806
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Nov 15 10:02:21 2006
New Revision: 118851
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118851
Log:
fortran/
2006-11-15 Tobias Burnus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |burnus at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-11-13 18:55 ---
Subject: Bug number PR29806
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-11/msg00871.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-13 10:05 ---
> Isn't this going to be allowed in F2008?
I checked 06-007r1.pdf and it is indeed allowed.
> (Perhaps it already is in F2003 -- I'm too lazy to check.)
No, it is not allowed in F2003. (See R numbers below)
> We sho
--- Comment #1 from erik dot edelmann at iki dot fi 2006-11-13 07:42
---
Isn't this going to be allowed in F2008? (Perhaps it already is in F2003 --
I'm too lazy to check.) We should print an error message if strict standard
conformance is requested, but since it is going to be valid c
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Keywo
