--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-15 08:16 ---
Subject: Bug 29712
Author: pault
Date: Mon Jan 15 08:16:17 2007
New Revision: 120790
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120790
Log:
2007-01-15 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-31 17:59 ---
This, at resolve.c:1578 sems to provide a fix (not regtested)-
for (arg = expr->value.function.actual; arg; arg = arg->next)
{
if (inquiry && arg->next != NULL && arg->next->expr
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-06 20:37 ---
This is my fault I think. There was a PR about ubound and assumed-size arrays
where we crashed and I changed the code to reject all ubound on them IIRC.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
Wha
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-04 16:46
---
Line 197 of testcase gfortran.dg/bound_2.f90 will have to be uncommented when
that bug is fixed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29712
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last recon
