--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-06 17:18 ---
Subject: Bug 29373
Author: pault
Date: Mon Nov 6 17:18:03 2006
New Revision: 118522
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118522
Log:
2006-11-06 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortra
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 08:17 ---
Fixed in trunk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Statu
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-13 12:51 ---
Subject: Bug 29373
Author: pault
Date: Fri Oct 13 12:51:07 2006
New Revision: 117692
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117692
Log:
2006-10-13 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/29
--- Comment #8 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-10-11 17:05 ---
Subject: Re: implicit type declaration and contained function
clash
tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>--- Comment #6 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-11 16:07 ---
>You're working too fast, Paul.
--- Comment #7 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-10-11 17:00 ---
Subject: Bug number PR29373
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-10/msg00620.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #6 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-11 16:07 ---
You're working too fast, Paul. Before I even got to read your answer you
already bring forward a patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29373
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-10 12:47 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Created an attachment (id=12403)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12403&action=view) [edit]
> Fix for the problem
Sorry, I should have said that this gets rid of the TWO p
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-10 12:41 ---
Created an attachment (id=12403)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12403&action=view)
Fix for the problem
Regtested on FC5/Athlon
Will submit asap.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #3 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-10-09 20:11 ---
Subject: Re: implicit type declaration and contained function
clash
tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>(BTW I added you to the CC list, it is kinda hard to answer in the right place
>otherwise)
>
>
Oh s**t - ne
--- Comment #2 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-09 11:34 ---
As I said, I ran into this when playing around with PR29267, and it was ugly
enough to warrant a PR of its own. Glad you share my opinion :-) Just to make
this clear: I would never do something this ugly outside bugzi
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-08 20:06 ---
Tobi,
This is a very unpleasant and venemous bug! Removing the
implicit character*32 (a-z)
results in
pr29373.f90: In function 'MAIN__':
pr29373.f90:8: fatal error: gfc_todo: Not Implemented: complex character arra
11 matches
Mail list logo
