--- Comment #12 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-10 21:52 ---
Subject: Bug 29216
Author: pault
Date: Fri Nov 10 21:52:00 2006
New Revision: 118666
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118666
Log:
2006-11-10 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Backport fro
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-19 06:42 ---
Fixed on trunk
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Statu
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-19 04:51 ---
Subject: Bug 29216
Author: pault
Date: Thu Oct 19 04:51:14 2006
New Revision: 117879
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117879
Log:
2006-10-19 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #9 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-10-18 11:20 ---
Subject: Bug number PR29216
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-10/msg00900.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #8 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-10-17 14:05 ---
Subject: Bug number PR29216
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-10/msg00852.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-17 04:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=12449)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12449&action=view)
Patch without initialization option
I have had to drop -finitialize-null due to problems in testing. I will have
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 16:51 ---
Created an attachment (id=12446)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12446&action=view)
Fix for this and PR29394
As well as fixing these PRs, this patch provides an option -finitialize-null,
which does
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-10 20:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=12406)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12406&action=view)
A development of the previous patch (ie. it works!).
This now regtests, apart from alloc_comp_basics_1.f90, which
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-10 12:48 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Paul,
>
> I'm not sure, but I think PR29394 is related to that one.
>
Yes, I already verified that yesterday but forgot to make a note of it. I'm
just gearing up to an afternoon of gfortra
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-10 07:56
---
Paul,
I'm not sure, but I think PR29394 is related to that one.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29216
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-08 22:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=12397)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12397&action=view)
Preliminary fix for this PR
This has only been tested against the reporter's example. Regtesting and
checking ag
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-25 16:29 ---
Yup, does it for me too! Confirmed.
As soon as I am near no an F95 standard, I will confirm that a function result
should indeed be initialized; logic suggests that it should!
Paul
$ /irun/bin/gfortran --version
GNU
12 matches
Mail list logo
