[Bug fortran/28923] Bad triplet interpretation in initialization

2006-09-10 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-10 19:43 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.1 Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/28923] Bad triplet interpretation in initialization

2006-09-10 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-10 17:32 --- Subject: Bug 28923 Author: pault Date: Sun Sep 10 17:32:22 2006 New Revision: 116819 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116819 Log: 2006-09-09 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/

[Bug fortran/28923] Bad triplet interpretation in initialization

2006-09-10 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-10 17:13 --- Subject: Bug 28923 Author: pault Date: Sun Sep 10 17:13:29 2006 New Revision: 116815 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116815 Log: 2006-09-10 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/

[Bug fortran/28923] Bad triplet interpretation in initialization

2006-09-09 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #2 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-09-09 12:35 --- Subject: Bug number PR28923 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-09/msg00341.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug fortran/28923] Bad triplet interpretation in initialization

2006-09-05 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-05 19:41 --- I had better deal with this, since I am teh author of the wrong bit of logic. Thanks Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -