--- Comment #18 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 04:37 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1 again
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #17 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-29 04:57 ---
Subject: Bug 28788
Author: pault
Date: Tue Aug 29 04:57:29 2006
New Revision: 116553
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116553
Log:
2006-08-29 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran
--- Comment #16 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-29 04:51 ---
Subject: Bug 28788
Author: pault
Date: Tue Aug 29 04:51:32 2006
New Revision: 116552
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116552
Log:
2006-08-29 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran
--- Comment #15 from paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr 2006-08-28
11:56 ---
Created an attachment (id=12146)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12146&action=view)
Fix and two test cases for the latest regressions
I post this now, as a prelude to submitting the
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 21:27
---
With latest svn update and full bootstrap with Martins case above on
i686-linux-pc-gnu:
(gdb) r
Starting program: /home/jerry/bin/f951 ' as free form.
.file ""
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segment
--- Comment #13 from aovb94 at dsl dot pipex dot com 2006-08-26 12:15
---
I'm getting an ICE and segmentation fault in the following code. I think it may
be related to Paul Thomas's observation about pointers to components of derived
type arrays. However, it does compile under these cir
--- Comment #12 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-08-26 09:30 ---
Subject: Re: [gfortran: 4.1, 4.2 regression] ICE on valid
code
Jerry and Martin,
All of this is very depressing - I can reproduce the 32 bit version of
the problem and, I suppose, will reproduce the 64 bit versi
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-25 17:09
---
On x86-64 linux:
(gdb) set args ' as free form.
.file ""
In file :598
use ModelParams
1
Error: The derived type 'p' at (1) is of type 'pp', which has not been defined.
In file :415
--- Comment #10 from martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de 2006-08-25
14:37 ---
> Perhaps you can let me have an idea of the kind of code that is doing
> this? Is this a continuation of the derived type problem or did it
> exist prior to the patch of a week back?
I don't think it ex
--- Comment #9 from martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de 2006-08-25 14:36
---
Created an attachment (id=12139)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12139&action=view)
new testcase
Compile with "gfortran -c lensing.f90"
and with "gfortran -c -I. lensing.f90"
--
http
--- Comment #8 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2006-08-25 13:25 ---
Subject: Re: [gfortran: 4.1, 4.2 regression] ICE on valid
code
martin,
>--- Comment #7 from martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de 2006-08-25
>12:57 ---
>Hi Paul,
>
>sorry for the late reply, I was away f
--- Comment #7 from martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de 2006-08-25 12:57
---
Hi Paul,
sorry for the late reply, I was away for a few days.
I compiled the most recent gcc sources, and there still appears to be some
bad memory access inside gfortran, which causes the compiler to someti
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-24 04:54 ---
Subject: Bug 28788
Author: pault
Date: Thu Aug 24 04:54:18 2006
New Revision: 116370
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116370
Log:
2006-08-24 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-24 04:47 ---
Subject: Bug 28788
Author: pault
Date: Thu Aug 24 04:47:28 2006
New Revision: 116369
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116369
Log:
2006-08-23 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #4 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-08-23 14:51 ---
Subject: Bug number PR28788
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00831.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #3 from paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr 2006-08-23
13:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=12117)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12117&action=view)
Fix for this and Martin Tee's submission to the list
Martin,
I would be very grateful if you would
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-22 20:02 ---
I have figured out what the problem is:
The module procedure formal arguments go into their own namespace; derived type
references pointing to the contained namespace. In the reformed association of
derived types, th
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-22 05:30 ---
> This problem was not present a few days ago, and it is quite elusive. Even
> adding or removing a few "!innocent" lines can change the error message,
> e.g. to something like
This is my doing, for which I apologise.
18 matches
Mail list logo
