--- Comment #15 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-24 03:05
---
Actually close it.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-24 03:04
---
Fixed on trunk. Closing.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ta
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-09 03:25
---
Subject: Bug 28039
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Apr 9 03:25:09 2010
New Revision: 158148
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158148
Log:
2010-04-08 Bud Davis
PR fortran/28039
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-09 02:03
---
Subject: Bug 28039
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Apr 9 02:03:10 2010
New Revision: 158147
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158147
Log:
2010-04-08 Bud Davis
PR fortran/28039
--- Comment #11 from bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-30 05:23 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-12/msg01200.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28039
--- Comment #10 from bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-30 04:25 ---
let's give this a try:
Index: gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/fmt_with_extra.f
===
--- gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/fmt_with_extra.f (revision 1555
--- Comment #9 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-27 12:11 ---
Test case of valid but previously failing code (which I forgot to include in
fmt_with_extra.f when xfailing it):
SUBROUTINE rw_inp()
CHARACTER(len=100) :: line
integer :: i5
character(100), p
--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-27 12:00 ---
Subject: Bug 28039
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Aug 27 11:59:51 2009
New Revision: 151141
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151141
Log:
2009-08-27 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/28039
*
--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-27 06:29 ---
As the patch was reverted, re-open the PR. Remember to include the example of
PR 41152 when submitting the next patch.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Ad
--- Comment #6 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-26 23:09 ---
I see the patch for this PR has been reverted. Please also remove the
test-case, or xfail it until a fix is committed, as it's now technically a
regression (at least my autotester thinks so). Don't forget that you must a
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-24 08:53 ---
Thanks for the fix, however, it causes some bogus diagnostic - see PR 41152
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28039
--- Comment #4 from bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-23 02:27 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-08/msg00324.html
--
bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #3 from bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-23 02:20 ---
Subject: Bug 28039
Author: bdavis
Date: Sun Aug 23 02:19:59 2009
New Revision: 151021
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151021
Log:
2009-08-22 Bud Davis
PR fortran/28093
*
--- Comment #2 from bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-22 23:21 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-08/msg00324.html
--
bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-20 10:59
---
Confirmed.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|
15 matches
Mail list logo
