--- Comment #11 from ray at ultramarine dot com 2006-05-27 20:53 ---
Subject: Re: Problems with direct access io
I believe I said that in the bug report.
On Sat, 27 May 2006, tkoenig at
gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #10 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 200
--- Comment #10 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-27 19:10
---
This bug does not occur with g77, as this version of the
test program shows:
$ cat testdirect.f
program testdirect
implicit none
integer a (100)
integer i,j,k,ier
real x
intege
--- Comment #9 from ray at ultramarine dot com 2006-05-27 12:21 ---
Subject: Re: Problems with direct access io
Good work, knew this would be hard!
Ray
On Sat, 27 May 2006, jvdelisle at gcc
dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 20
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-27 05:10
---
Here is some good news. I came up with a test case that fails with gfortran
and passes with intel. The bad news is that I have not fixed it yet. At least
I have something to work with now and its ugly.
program
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-27 02:35
---
The following patch causes no regressions. I can't reproduce the problem here,
but I have a hunch.
Ray, can you try this and see if it resolves the problem?
Thanks for tests and reports.
Index: io/transfer.c
=
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 05:08
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27757
--- Comment #5 from ray at ultramarine dot com 2006-05-25 02:17 ---
Subject: Re: Problems with direct access io
On Wed, 25 May 2006, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 01:20
> ---
> If you are runni
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 01:20
---
If you are running a gfortran straight from the FC 4 distribution it probably
does not have the latest fixes to the IO that we have in the 4.1 branch. These
have not been released yet. Release 4.1.1 is being pre
--- Comment #3 from ray at ultramarine dot com 2006-05-25 01:03 ---
Subject: Re: Problems with direct access io
On Wed, 25 May 2006, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 00:51
> ---
> I will take a lo
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 00:51
---
I will take a look at this one. This does seem odd. Can you tell us what
platform you are running on and what version of gfortran.
gfortran -v will tell us useful info.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27757
--- Comment #1 from ray at ultramarine dot com 2006-05-24 14:58 ---
Created an attachment (id=11505)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11505&action=view)
source and results
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27757
12 matches
Mail list logo
