[Bug fortran/27554] Strange assembler produced

2006-06-25 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 18:12 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.1 Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/27554] Strange assembler produced

2006-06-25 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 18:08 --- Subject: Bug 27554 Author: pault Date: Sun Jun 25 18:08:13 2006 New Revision: 114994 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114994 Log: 2006-06-25 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/

[Bug fortran/27554] Strange assembler produced

2006-06-25 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-25 15:11 --- Subject: Bug 27554 Author: pault Date: Sun Jun 25 15:11:02 2006 New Revision: 114987 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114987 Log: 2006-06-25 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/

[Bug fortran/27554] Strange assembler produced

2006-05-29 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-29 18:51 --- Ah, rats! What I say is partially correct - the reference to abs, in your test case is what is producing the error. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27554

[Bug fortran/27554] Strange assembler produced

2006-05-29 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-29 13:26 --- My fix for pr25147 and pr25098 also fixes this problem. The code is incorrect ; abs being interpreted as a real variable, rather than the intrinsic of this name. The patch produces the error that a procedure was expe

[Bug fortran/27554] Strange assembler produced

2006-05-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-13 03:52 --- Confirmed, -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCO