--- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-02 11:35
---
That one is annoying. Reduced testcase is:
FUNCTION X()
ENTRY X1
IF (X .GT. 0) CALL FOO(X)
END
The error message is:
a.f: In function master.0.x:
a.f:3: error: invalid operand to binar
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 21:02 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I'm amazed that 27889 is a duplicate of this bug, although I agree that they
> have similar error messages. They happen in very different (and specific
> circumstances). FYI, the testcases
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 20:58
---
I'm amazed that 27889 is a duplicate of this bug, although I agree that they
have similar error messages. They happen in very different (and specific
circumstances). FYI, the testcases from 27889 are:
[on 4.1 at
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 15:16 ---
*** Bug 27889 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfi
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 05:20 ---
As far as I can tell it is a middle-end/gimplifier problem:
real4 __result_master.0.tsl;
real4 tsl.0 [value-expr: __result_master.0.tsl];
Unless the value expression should also be marked as TREE_ADDRESSABLE.
--- Comment #1 from johnurban at adelphia dot net 2006-05-08 05:17 ---
Created an attachment (id=11400)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11400&action=view)
script that shows bug + output from running script
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27478
