[Bug fortran/27470] [4.1/4.2 regression] wrong memory allocator for derived types

2006-05-15 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #8 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-15 19:38 --- Subject: Bug number PR 27470 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00365.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s

[Bug fortran/27470] [4.1/4.2 regression] wrong memory allocator for derived types

2006-05-14 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-14 22:34 --- P5: F95 is not release-critical. -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/27470] [4.1/4.2 regression] wrong memory allocator for derived types

2006-05-10 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-10 18:27 --- Subject: Bug 27470 Author: tkoenig Date: Wed May 10 18:26:51 2006 New Revision: 113680 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113680 Log: 2005-05-10 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fo

[Bug fortran/27470] [4.1/4.2 regression] wrong memory allocator for derived types

2006-05-08 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 22:11 --- Created an attachment (id=11416) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11416&action=view) better patch Forgot to initialize a variable in the earlier attempt. This one looks OK. -- tkoenig at gcc

[Bug fortran/27470] [4.1/4.2 regression] wrong memory allocator for derived types

2006-05-08 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 21:59 --- Created an attachment (id=11415) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11415&action=view) patch This fixes the regression. It isn't pretty, because it would need to be changed as part of an implementa

[Bug fortran/27470] [4.1/4.2 regression] wrong memory allocator for derived types

2006-05-08 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 21:06 --- Here's a test case that does not require transfer: TYPE foo INTEGER, DIMENSION(:), POINTER :: array END TYPE foo type(foo),allocatable,dimension(:) :: mol ALLOCATE (mol(1)) ALLOCATE (mol(1)%array(5)