[Bug fortran/26681] internal compiler error

2006-03-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-15 16:10 --- (In reply to comment #5) > I do not believe that pr24558 is anything to do with this because there are no > entry's in your code, unless they are in the modules. Note I was taking about the library in general, not j

[Bug fortran/26681] internal compiler error

2006-03-15 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-15 08:14 --- Herve, > So what ? Is there a patch which I should use to correct this error ? Do > you need more info to reproduce this ICE ? Please ask and I will try to > provide all the available info. > Thanks. The could you

[Bug fortran/26681] internal compiler error

2006-03-14 Thread Herve dot Chapuis at tours dot inra dot fr
--- Comment #4 from Herve dot Chapuis at tours dot inra dot fr 2006-03-14 15:37 --- Subject: Re: internal compiler error pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org a écrit : > --- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-14 15:22 > --- > I cannot reproduce this ICE with 4.

[Bug fortran/26681] internal compiler error

2006-03-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-14 15:22 --- I cannot reproduce this ICE with 4.2.0 20060312. I do run into another ICE compiling fspak90 but that is filed as PR 24558. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26681

[Bug fortran/26681] internal compiler error

2006-03-14 Thread Herve dot Chapuis at tours dot inra dot fr
--- Comment #2 from Herve dot Chapuis at tours dot inra dot fr 2006-03-14 15:14 --- Subject: Re: internal compiler error pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org a écrit : > --- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-14 14:59 > --- > Can you attach fspak90.f90 (if it i

[Bug fortran/26681] internal compiler error

2006-03-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-14 14:59 --- Can you attach fspak90.f90 (if it is legal to do so)? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26681