[Bug fortran/26409] [4.2 regression] ICE on Assumed shape nested subroutine

2006-02-24 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 14:15 --- First, I am sorry to be a "doubting Thomas" - I finally succeeded in reproducing the problem. Second, I unpatched the above and find that this is indeed the problem. I will try to understand why but: (i) I have po

[Bug fortran/26409] [4.2 regression] ICE on Assumed shape nested subroutine

2006-02-24 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 13:54 --- Subject: Bug 26409 Author: pault Date: Fri Feb 24 13:54:06 2006 New Revision: 111417 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111417 Log: 2006-02-24 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/

[Bug fortran/26409] [4.2 regression] ICE on Assumed shape nested subroutine

2006-02-24 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 13:15 --- (In reply to comment #7) > A few binary search steps later: Works with revision 111270, fails with > 111271. > It seems to be related to the patch > First, I am sorry to be a "doubting Thomas" - I finally succeeded

[Bug fortran/26409] [4.2 regression] ICE on Assumed shape nested subroutine

2006-02-23 Thread eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 22:31 --- A few binary search steps later: Works with revision 111270, fails with 111271. It seems to be related to the patch 2006-02-19 H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * resolve.c (resolve_contained_functions): Cal

[Bug fortran/26409] [4.2 regression] ICE on Assumed shape nested subroutine

2006-02-23 Thread eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 14:11 --- For me, on Linux/x86, it works with revision 111200, but ICEs with 111300 and 111387. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26409

[Bug fortran/26409] [4.2 regression] ICE on Assumed shape nested subroutine

2006-02-23 Thread martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de
--- Comment #5 from martin at mpa-garching dot mpg dot de 2006-02-23 09:01 --- I still see it with version 4.2.0 20060222 :( I guess it would really nice if "gfortran -v" would print the SVN revision number... ~/tmp>gfortran -v -c bug.f90 Using built-in specs. Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu

[Bug fortran/26409] [4.2 regression] ICE on Assumed shape nested subroutine

2006-02-22 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 06:27 --- and with "4.2.0 20060222". Where's the bug, chaps? Paul -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26409

[Bug fortran/26409] [4.2 regression] ICE on Assumed shape nested subroutine

2006-02-22 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 00:06 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Confirmed. > It worked with "4.2.0 20060215". > It works with GNU Fortran 95 (GCC) 4.2.0 20060219 on FC3/Athlon Paul -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26409

[Bug fortran/26409] [4.2 regression] ICE on Assumed shape nested subroutine

2006-02-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-22 00:38 --- Backtrace: #0 gfc_get_nodesc_array_type (etype=0x42c10460, as=0x42b05940, packed=2) at /Users/pinskia/src/gcc/local/gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-types.c:1015 #1 0x000910a8 in gfc_get_function_type (sym=0x0) at /Users/pins

[Bug fortran/26409] [4.2 regression] ICE on Assumed shape nested subroutine

2006-02-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-22 00:37 --- Confirmed. It worked with "4.2.0 20060215". -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -