[Bug fortran/26064] 4.1 regression introduced with patch for bug 18197

--- Comment #14 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-07 22:31 --- Subject: Bug 26064 Author: hjl Date: Tue Mar 7 22:30:58 2006 New Revision: 111822 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111822 Log: 2006-03-07 H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/26041

[Bug fortran/26064] 4.1 regression introduced with patch for bug 18197

--- Comment #13 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-07 22:29 --- Subject: Bug 26064 Author: hjl Date: Tue Mar 7 22:29:32 2006 New Revision: 111821 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111821 Log: 2006-03-07 H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/26041

[Bug fortran/26064] 4.1 regression introduced with patch for bug 18197

--- Comment #12 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-05 19:53 --- Subject: Bug 26064 Author: hjl Date: Sun Feb 5 19:53:00 2006 New Revision: 110619 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110619 Log: 2006-02-05 H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/26041

[Bug fortran/26064] 4.1 regression introduced with patch for bug 18197

--- Comment #11 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-05 19:52 --- Subject: Bug 26064 Author: hjl Date: Sun Feb 5 19:52:35 2006 New Revision: 110618 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110618 Log: 2006-02-05 H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/26041

[Bug fortran/26064] 4.1 regression introduced with patch for bug 18197

--- Comment #10 from sven dot buijssen at math dot uni-dortmund dot de 2006-02-02 16:12 --- They did with gfortran < Revision 108555. With current revision 110515 backing out only the patch for 18197 (and not applying your patch) they do not. The error message I get with revision 11051

[Bug fortran/26064] 4.1 regression introduced with patch for bug 18197

--- Comment #9 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-02-02 14:49 --- If you back out the change for bug 18197, does several thousand lines of code compile? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26064

[Bug fortran/26064] 4.1 regression introduced with patch for bug 18197

--- Comment #8 from sven dot buijssen at math dot uni-dortmund dot de 2006-02-02 11:30 --- I tested the patch and encountered another internal compiler error. The problem, however, is that this new error so far only occurs with a code consisting of several thousand code lines and disapp

[Bug fortran/26064] 4.1 regression introduced with patch for bug 18197

--- Comment #7 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-02-02 01:19 --- Please try this one http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg00102.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26064

[Bug fortran/26064] 4.1 regression introduced with patch for bug 18197

--- Comment #6 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-02-01 21:20 --- I got Breakpoint 3, gfc_sym_type (sym=0xb5b800) at /net/gnu-13/export/gnu/src/gcc-last/gcc/gcc/fortran/trans-types.c:1301 1301 type = gfc_typenode_for_spec (&sym->ts); $8 = {name = 0xb51b46 "present", module = 0x0, d

[Bug fortran/26064] 4.1 regression introduced with patch for bug 18197

--- Comment #5 from sven dot buijssen at math dot uni-dortmund dot de 2006-02-01 20:01 --- I'm sorry. I had been experimenting which circumstances trigger the ice and accidentally deleted the "optional" argument. To be valid the code needs to be like % cat > ice.f90 name,

[Bug fortran/26064] 4.1 regression introduced with patch for bug 18197

--- Comment #4 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-02-01 17:00 --- I didn't see it: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cat xxx.f90 module ice implicit none contains subroutine foo() contains subroutine bar(baz) integer :: baz if (present(baz)) then endif end

[Bug fortran/26064] 4.1 regression introduced with patch for bug 18197

--- Comment #3 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-02-01 16:49 --- It is the same bug. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 26041 *** -- hjl at lucon dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug fortran/26064] 4.1 regression introduced with patch for bug 18197

--- Comment #2 from sven dot buijssen at math dot uni-dortmund dot de 2006-02-01 16:36 --- The patch fixes the regression, but introduces a new internal compiler error for the following testcase: --- cut here --- % cat > ice.f90 for instructions. --

[Bug fortran/26064] 4.1 regression introduced with patch for bug 18197

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-01 14:45 --- This looks related to PR 26041. Can you try the patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-01/msg02261.html ? -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Adde