[Bug fortran/26017] allocate (a(1:-1)) should yield zero-sized array

2006-04-29 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-29 21:05 --- Fixed on 4.1 and trunk. Closing. -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/26017] allocate (a(1:-1)) should yield zero-sized array

2006-04-29 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-29 21:02 --- Subject: Bug 26017 Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Apr 29 21:02:04 2006 New Revision: 113381 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113381 Log: 2006-04-29 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fo

[Bug fortran/26017] allocate (a(1:-1)) should yield zero-sized array

2006-04-16 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-16 20:29 --- Subject: Bug 26017 Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Apr 16 20:29:24 2006 New Revision: 112988 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112988 Log: 2006-04-16 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fo

[Bug fortran/26017] allocate (a(1:-1)) should yield zero-sized array

2006-04-14 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #5 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-04-14 17:40 --- Subject: Bug number PR 26017 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-04/msg00537.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s

[Bug fortran/26017] allocate (a(1:-1)) should yield zero-sized array

2006-04-09 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-09 21:03 --- Created an attachment (id=11230) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11230&action=view) This one actually works :-) -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug fortran/26017] allocate (a(1:-1)) should yield zero-sized array

2006-04-09 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-09 19:37 --- Created an attachment (id=11228) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11228&action=view) patch This patch should do the trick. -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Remov

[Bug fortran/26017] allocate (a(1:-1)) should yield zero-sized array

2006-04-08 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-08 21:47 --- Checking wether size is negative won't work as a complete fix for this. Consider the following example: $ cat a4.f90 program main real, allocatable:: a(:,:) allocate (a(1:-1,1:-1)) print *,size(a) end program

[Bug fortran/26017] allocate (a(1:-1)) should yield zero-sized array

2006-01-29 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-29 15:13 --- Confirmed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn|