--- Comment #13 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-10 23:21 ---
Fixed on 4.1, too.
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|
--- Comment #12 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-10 23:20 ---
Subject: Bug 25756
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Feb 10 23:20:10 2006
New Revision: 110856
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110856
Log:
2006-02-10 Steven G. Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR for
--- Comment #11 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2006-01-13 22:20 ---
Subject: Re: ICE on valid code with labels
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 10:15:13PM -, aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> Should the warning be made consistent between fixed- and free form?
>
--- Comment #10 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-13 22:15 ---
Should the warning be made consistent between fixed- and free form?
Both the gfc_warning vs. gfc_warning_now and the strings are not consistent.
Fixed Form has:
gfc_warning ("Statement label in blank line will be ign
--- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-13 21:10 ---
Committed the fix to trunk. I'll wait a few days for 4.1.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25756
--- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-13 21:09 ---
Subject: Bug 25756
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Jan 13 21:09:24 2006
New Revision: 109674
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109674
Log:
2006-01-13 Steven G. Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fort
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-12 22:42 ---
I have a patch.
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unas
--- Comment #6 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2006-01-12 22:41 ---
Subject: Re: ICE on valid code with labels
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 08:18:50PM -, kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> get rids of the ICE, but I don't understand why we have an ICE in firs
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-12 20:18 ---
The following simple patch
Index: parse.c
===
--- parse.c (revision 109606)
+++ parse.c (working copy)
@@ -349,8 +349,10 @@ next_free (void)
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-11 21:41 ---
Confirmed. (well already via IRC). Note you will not get this email for a
while anyways.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #3 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-11 21:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=10628)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10628&action=view)
testcase label_5.f90
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25756
--- Comment #2 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-11 21:33 ---
Created an attachment (id=10627)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10627&action=view)
testcase label_4.f90
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25756
--- Comment #1 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-11 21:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=10626)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10626&action=view)
testcase label_3.f90
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25756
13 matches
Mail list logo
