[Bug fortran/25403] gfortran run-time error with multiple tabs in format continuation

2006-09-01 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-01 19:34 --- oops disregard that last comment. Typed in the wrong box. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25403

[Bug fortran/25403] gfortran run-time error with multiple tabs in format continuation

2006-09-01 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-01 19:16 --- I am looking into this a little. setWunused is called which calls SetWextras. Just a little tweaking we need to do here I think. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25403

[Bug fortran/25403] gfortran run-time error with multiple tabs in format continuation

2006-09-01 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-01 19:14 --- Current gfortran is handling this correctly -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/25403] gfortran run-time error with multiple tabs in format continuation

2005-12-14 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-14 17:29 --- Technically, gfortran can do whatever it wants, because the code is nonconforming. The tab character is not a member of the Fortran character set. The code is using a tab where a member of the Fortran character set

[Bug fortran/25403] gfortran run-time error with multiple tabs in format continuation

2005-12-14 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-14 09:26 --- Confirmed (and it's a regression wrt g77). The tree dump has: dt_parm.0.format = "(i4,i4, \ti4,i4)"; so I think it's up to the front-end to remove that. -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: