--- Comment #7 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 16:24
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Eric, can this bug be closed as FIXED now?
>
Yes, I would say so.
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #6 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 00:46 ---
Eric, can this bug be closed as FIXED now?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25217
--- Comment #5 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-19 21:31
---
Subject: Bug 25217
Author: eedelman
Date: Sat Aug 19 21:31:47 2006
New Revision: 116262
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116262
Log:
fortran/
2006-08-20 Erik Edelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-19 21:06
---
Subject: Bug 25217
Author: eedelman
Date: Sat Aug 19 21:05:59 2006
New Revision: 116261
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116261
Log:
fortran/
2006-08-19 Erik Edelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #3 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-07-18 20:40 ---
Subject: Bug number PR 25217
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-07/msg00796.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #2 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-09 07:48 ---
To quote from the F95 June 97 working draft, note 12.17:
"Because an INTENT(OUT) variable is considered undefined on entry to the
procedure, any default initialization specified for its type will be applied."
Of the
--- Comment #1 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-02 19:28
---
Confirmed.
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
