--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 06:27 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 05:02 ---
Subject: Bug 25099
Author: pault
Date: Mon May 8 05:01:56 2006
New Revision: 113618
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113618
Log:
2006-05-08 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-23 11:56 ---
Subject: Bug 25099
Author: pault
Date: Sun Apr 23 11:56:37 2006
New Revision: 113194
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113194
Log:
2006-04-23 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #4 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-04-21 16:15 ---
Subject: Bug number PR25099
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-04/msg00802.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 02:14 ---
This ICEs for me on the mainline, backtrace:
#0 integer_onep (expr=0x0) at /Users/pinskia/src/gcc/local/gcc/gcc/tree.c:1226
#1 0x0006bf90 in gfc_conv_loop_setup (loop=0xb7d8) at
/Users/pinskia/src/gcc/local/gcc
--- Comment #2 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 13:23
---
*** Bug 25100 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25099
--- Comment #1 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-30 11:33
---
Currently gfortran crashes on this code, because of PR 22146. I'll leave this
PR (rather than marking it as a duplicate) as a reminder that, when we fix PR
22146, we need to check conformance of arguments as well.
