--- Comment #5 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-06 09:10 ---
Fixed.
--
tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-06 08:55 ---
Subject: Bug 25076
Author: tobi
Date: Sat Oct 6 08:55:30 2007
New Revision: 129050
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=129050
Log:
PR fortran/25076
fortran/
* resolve.c (gfc_find_forall_index): Move
--- Comment #3 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-04 21:33 ---
Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-10/msg00267.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25076
--- Comment #2 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-04 19:05 ---
I'm testing a patch.
--
tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|u
--- Comment #1 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-28 21:44
---
Confirmed.
The F2003 (draft) standard says, in 7.4.4.1:
"C736 (R755) A subscript or stride in a foral l-triplet-spec shall not contain
a
reference to any index-name in the foral l-triplet-spec -list in which i
