[Bug fortran/25068] better diagnostic needed

2005-11-26 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #2 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2005-11-26 20:19 --- (In reply to comment #1) > I think we have the right to > accept non-default IOSTAT variable if we do it correctly ;) not with -std=f95 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25068

[Bug fortran/25068] better diagnostic needed

2005-11-26 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-26 19:40 --- Humm... I don't think that one is bug, really. I think we have the right to accept non-default IOSTAT variable if we do it correctly ;) ## gfortran ## ## g95 ## In file foo.f90:3 CLOSE(10,IOSTAT=I)