--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-21 02:11
---
Fixed on 4.3, closing
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-21 01:48
---
Subject: Bug 25061
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Jun 21 01:48:21 2007
New Revision: 125907
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=125907
Log:
2007-06-20 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-21 01:18
---
Subject: Bug 25061
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Jun 21 01:18:02 2007
New Revision: 125906
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=125906
Log:
2007-06-20 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #3 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-06-19 05:00 ---
Subject: Bug number PR25061
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-06/msg01294.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #2 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-18 15:49 ---
I had a short look at this. The problem is in decl.c:693f:
if (sym->attr.flavor != 0
&& sym->attr.proc != 0
&& (sym->attr.subroutine || sym->attr.function)
&& sym->attr.if_source
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-26 19:31
---
gfortran doesn't catch that issue:
## Intel ##
fortcom: Warning: foo.f90, line 2: This name has not been given an explicit
type. [I]
SUBROUTINE S1(I)
---^
fortcom: Warning: foo.f90, line 4: This na
