--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-27 17:57 ---
Closing as fixed for 4.0.2.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From haefele at mpi-magdeburg dot mpg dot de
2005-08-13 13:18 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> How old is your version of gfortran? I can compile your example with
lion:[~]> gfortran --version
GNU Fortran 95 (GCC 4.0.1 (Debian 4.0.1-2))
Copyright (C) 2005 Free So
--- Additional Comments From kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-12 22:16
---
How old is your version of gfortran? I can compile your example with
troutmask:sgk[220] gfc41 --version
GNU Fortran 95 (GCC 4.1.0 20050811 (experimental))
troutmask:sgk[221] gfc --version
GNU Fortran 95 (G
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23368
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-12
21:36 ---
We need e04mfkt.f if it is open source.
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-12
21:35 ---
The NAG source isn't generally available. Can you provide a small
test that exposes the bug?
Also, it would be helpful if you could run the f951 binary under gdb,
compile the source and provie a backtrace.