[Bug fortran/23169] INTENT information not used in the middle-end for optimizations

2009-04-14 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-14 15:20 --- The original testcase in #0 appears to be fixed if compiled with -fwhole-file. Andrew's comment #4 appears to be still an issue?! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23169

[Bug fortran/23169] INTENT information not used in the middle-end for optimizations

2009-01-03 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-03 19:46 --- Maybe realted: PR29697?! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23169

[Bug fortran/23169] INTENT information not used in the middle-end for optimizations

2009-01-02 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-02 11:04 --- (In reply to comment #8) > There is no way to tell the middle-end about anonymous readonly memory. So, we could either - teach that to the middle-end (I couldn't, though :-) - make a duplicate variable for intent(

[Bug fortran/23169] INTENT information not used in the middle-end for optimizations

2009-01-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-02 10:29 --- There is no way to tell the middle-end about anonymous readonly memory. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23169

[Bug fortran/23169] INTENT information not used in the middle-end for optimizations

2008-12-29 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-29 14:25 --- (In reply to comment #4) > Here is a testcase which we would not get unless we take intent(in) into > account: [...] > foo should always be zero as bar should not be able to touch b or c. Is this really related to t

[Bug fortran/23169] INTENT information not used in the middle-end for optimizations

2008-12-26 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-27 00:38 --- *** Bug 36076 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug fortran/23169] INTENT information not used in the middle-end for optimizations

2008-09-21 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-21 13:36 --- A C equivalent test case "works". Once the infamous multiple-decls-per-function issue in gfortran is fixed, this bug probably will disappear. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23169

[Bug fortran/23169] INTENT information not used in the middle-end for optimizations

2005-10-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-09 17:41 --- There are a couple of problems here. First I noticed that bar in foo is not marked as pure even though the IPA mechanism marked it as such, so that looks like a fortran front-end bug in that it has two different DECL

[Bug fortran/23169] INTENT information not used in the middle-end for optimizations

2005-10-02 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-03 06:14 --- No it is not. -- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn|2313

[Bug fortran/23169] INTENT information not used in the middle-end for optimizations

2005-10-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-02 21:27 --- I think this is just another case of PR 23134. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/23169] INTENT information not used in the middle-end for optimizations

2005-08-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-01 12:07 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at