--- Comment #14 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-09 22:53 ---
Close as FIXED (on the trunk/4.3.0). Note, for debugging multi-dimensional
arrays one also needs the following gdb patch:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2007-11/msg00438.html
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #13 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-09 17:08 ---
Subject: Bug 22244
Author: jakub
Date: Sun Dec 9 17:08:06 2007
New Revision: 130724
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=130724
Log:
PR fortran/22244
* langhooks-def.h (LANG_HOOKS_G
--- Comment #12 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-27 09:56 ---
I think the patch also fixes PR 17905.
Current patch links:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-11/msg00888.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-11/msg00903.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show
--- Comment #11 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-12 10:50 ---
Attempt to deal with assumed shape, allocated etc. arrays:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-11/msg00612.html
Does not yet implement the DW_AT_associated and DW_AT_allocated attributes.
For those, guess for ALLOC
--- Comment #10 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-02 18:26
---
I think there are other issues with array information, so I think this PR
shouldn't be closed yet.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-04 21:46 ---
Can this be closed?
--
tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-25 09:32 ---
Subject: Bug 22244
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Sep 25 09:32:44 2007
New Revision: 128747
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128747
Log:
PR fortran/22244
* Make-lang.in (fortran/trans-ty
--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-28 16:09 ---
Subject: Bug 22244
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Aug 28 16:08:57 2007
New Revision: 127864
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127864
Log:
PR fortran/22244
* Make-lang.in (fortran/trans-ty
--- Comment #6 from tom dot horsley at ccur dot com 2006-08-03 13:45
---
I'd add that this isn't a problem just for multi-dimension arrays. If you
declare different arrays like "integer a1(5)" "integer a2(1:5)" "integer
a3(2:6)"
they all show up with incorrect lower bound of 0 and upper
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-09 23:31 ---
Also this causes us to lose information lowering in the middle-end that what
the size of the arrays were.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22244
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-30
13:29 ---
g77 gets this right:
$ g77 -g array2.f
$ gdb ./a.out
GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (6.3.0.0-0.30.1rh)
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, a
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-30
12:20 ---
Confirmed, Paul B. said he was going to do this (IIRC).
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-30
08:42 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-debu
--- Additional Comments From woodzltc at sources dot redhat dot com
2005-06-30 06:39 ---
This is Feng's comment:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-06/msg00479.html
Just FYI. Thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22244
14 matches
Mail list logo
