http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22210
Bud Davis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22210
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
AssignedTo|pinskia at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22210
John T changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jrt at worldlinc dot net
--- Comment #15 from Jo
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-05 03:25
---
1 year has gone by again.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22210
--- Comment #13 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-03 18:05
---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Maybe this weekend :). I guess I have been really behind on my FSF bugs.
Yearly reminder.
Any progress here? :)
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Remo
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-03 17:42
---
(In reply to comment #11)
> So, did you have time? :-)
Maybe this weekend :). I guess I have been really behind on my FSF bugs.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22210
--- Comment #11 from tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-04 21:44 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Ok, I guess I blew looking at this for a year. Too busy with work really :).
> Anyways maybe next weekend.
So, did you have time? :-)
--
tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-09 08:06
---
Ok, I guess I blew looking at this for a year. Too busy with work really :).
Anyways maybe next weekend.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22210
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-18 06:58 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > Where did this one go to? Can we close it?
>
> It is still funny looking code. I might take a look this weekend or on June 27
> when I am traveling to the GCC su
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-13 18:55 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Where did this one go to? Can we close it?
It is still funny looking code. I might take a look this weekend or on June 27
when I am traveling to the GCC summit.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/
--- Comment #7 from paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr 2006-06-08
06:54 ---
Where did this one go to? Can we close it?
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22210
--- Comment #6 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-05 17:04 ---
Assigning to Andrew Pinski because I wont be able to work on this for a while.
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-03 18:45 ---
Steven, I am assigning this from your suse account (one which does exist any
more) to your @gcc.gnu.org account, if you don't have the time to look into
this again, can you assign it to me as I was looking into it an
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-18
06:15 ---
Isn't this fixed or did the output_constructor part never get committed?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22210
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-09
16:46 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
E
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-06-29
22:04 ---
Created an attachment (id=9175)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9175&action=view)
Current CONSTRUCTOR patch
As per Steven's request in private mail, I attach the current patch to make
CON
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-27
23:46 ---
This is not the first time I have seen this in both the Ada and gfortran
front-ends.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22210
17 matches
Mail list logo
