--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-16
21:24 ---
Well, I spoke with rth today on IRC, and it appears that I do have a broken
glibc (in fact, it sounds like most glibc are broken on alpha-linux). So
resolving this one as invalid.
--
What|
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-14
10:55 ---
Well, my latest tests on alphaev67-linux
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-06/msg00870.html) does not show any
improvement (most failures are due to this problem). What I don't understand is
why
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-13
20:56 ---
Now that it is fixed, we can at least CONFIRM it ;-)
As for why the commit message didn't appear it: "PR libfortran/PR21797" seems to
have confused the parsing mechanism for detecting bugs related to comm
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-13
19:49 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Although, unlike Steve, I am sure I'm not allowed to ok this patch, I would
> really like to see it go in too. alpha-linux really is an interesting platform
> for regtesting (and,
