[Bug fortran/21104] Segmentation fault on correct code

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-09 06:34 --- Subject: Bug 21104 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-09 06:34:08 Modified files: gcc/fortran: ChangeLog Make-lang.in dependency.h

[Bug fortran/21104] Segmentation fault on correct code

--- Additional Comments From rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-09 06:24 --- Patch applied to mainline. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/21104] Segmentation fault on correct code

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-09 06:22 --- Subject: Bug 21104 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-09 06:22:29 Modified files: gcc/fortran: ChangeLog trans.h trans-array.h trans

[Bug fortran/21104] Segmentation fault on correct code

--- Additional Comments From rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-05 13:20 --- Working on a patch. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |

[Bug fortran/21104] Segmentation fault on correct code

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Last reconfirmed|2005-04-23 16:47:32 |2005-07-23 06:01:08 date|

[Bug fortran/21104] Segmentation fault on correct code

--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-04-27 16:03 --- This is a bug for the following reasons: A] From the standard, we have: 12.3.1.1 Explicit interface A procedure other than a statement function shall have an explicit interface if .. (2) The procedure ha

[Bug fortran/21104] Segmentation fault on correct code

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 16:58 --- (In reply to comment #5) > PS Andrew, for someone who claims not to know fortran, you seem to get into > some of its murkier corners! We'll have you writing fortran code yet... I get help from people who

[Bug fortran/21104] Segmentation fault on correct code

--- Additional Comments From pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 16:47 --- It is my belief that this is correct code, after all. An explicit interface is REQUIRED to invoke a procedure with a pointer or target dummy argument or a pointer function result. In other circumstances it

[Bug fortran/21104] Segmentation fault on correct code

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-19 19:23 --- (In reply to comment #3) > Further reduced testcase: > Lahey/Fujitsu Fortran 95 Source Check Output I think everyone should read which David E. send me

[Bug fortran/21104] Segmentation fault on correct code

--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-19 16:15 --- Further reduced testcase: module perdida_m contains subroutine perdida (z, x) real, dimension (:) :: x, z z = generalized_hookes_law (x) + 1.0 end subroutine perdida function generalized_ho

[Bug fortran/21104] Segmentation fault on correct code

--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-04-19 13:31 --- Subject: Re: Segmentation fault on correct code > > --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org > 2005-04-19 12:21 --- > I don't think this is correct code. See PR 20960. Yes ICC

[Bug fortran/21104] Segmentation fault on correct code

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-19 12:21 --- I don't think this is correct code. See PR 20960. Yes ICC does not seg fault on it. I will note that XLC does the same thing as gfortran. I also think this is a dup of bug 18197. -- http://gcc.gnu.