[Bug fortran/20925] "Possible frontend bug: array constructor not expanded"

2005-05-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-14 20:58 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 19925 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/20925] "Possible frontend bug: array constructor not expanded"

2005-05-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-05 20:12 --- *** Bug 21394 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/20925] "Possible frontend bug: array constructor not expanded"

2005-04-15 Thread belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru
-- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-04-

[Bug fortran/20925] "Possible frontend bug: array constructor not expanded"

2005-04-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-09 22:29 --- Hmm, /* Problems occur when we get something like integer :: a(lots) = (/(i, i=1,lots)/) */ /* TODO: Unexpanded array initializers. */ internal_er

[Bug fortran/20925] "Possible frontend bug: array constructor not expanded"

2005-04-09 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-09 22:27 --- Note this one and PR 20923, I found with the benchmark here: which is about f95 features. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=