--- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-12 05:43
---
Subject: Bug 20900
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-12 05:43:08
Modified files:
gcc/fortran: ChangeLog gfor
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-01
15:57 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-01
07:39 ---
Subject: Bug 20900
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-01 07:39:08
Modified files:
gcc/fortran: ChangeLog gfortran.h match.c resolve.
--- Additional Comments From pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-26 19:32
---
This is resolved by http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-09/msg00438.html
Paul T
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20900
--- Additional Comments From Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot
uni-muenchen dot de 2005-05-19 19:22 ---
Subject: Re: use-associated variable may not be equivalenced
jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2005-05-19 17:54
> ---
--- Additional Comments From jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2005-05-19 17:54
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> There's no 11.7 neither in the F95 nor the F2K drafts I'm having. This is
> invalid by the constraints in 5.5.1 in the F95 draft. Is there any other
> constraint you were aiming at?
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-19 17:34
---
There's no 11.7 neither in the F95 nor the F2K drafts I'm having. This is
invalid by the constraints in 5.5.1 in the F95 draft. Is there any other
constraint you were aiming at?
--
What|Remov
