[Bug fortran/20858] NULL doesn't get its argument type (kind)

2006-02-10 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-10 20:10 --- Fixed on 4.1 and trunk. -- kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Sta

[Bug fortran/20858] NULL doesn't get its argument type (kind)

2006-02-10 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-10 20:09 --- Subject: Bug 20858 Author: kargl Date: Fri Feb 10 20:09:41 2006 New Revision: 110848 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110848 Log: 2006-02-10 Steven G. Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fort

[Bug fortran/20858] NULL doesn't get its argument type (kind)

2006-02-10 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-10 19:01 --- Subject: Bug 20858 Author: kargl Date: Fri Feb 10 19:01:05 2006 New Revision: 110845 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110845 Log: 2006-02-05 Steven G. Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/2085

[Bug fortran/20858] NULL doesn't get its argument type

2005-04-23 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Additional Comments From jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2005-04-23 13:47 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Are there any circumstances where the argument to NULL has any meaning, besides > making a program invalid? PR21177 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20858

[Bug fortran/20858] NULL doesn't get its argument type

2005-04-22 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-22 14:33 --- Are there any circumstances where the argument to NULL has any meaning, besides making a program invalid? -- What|Removed |Added