--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20541
--- Comment #38 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-17 11:33 ---
(In reply to comment #37)
Sorry all, I screwed up on the PR number - it should have been 29541
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20541
--- Comment #37 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 22:29 ---
Subject: Bug 20541
Author: pault
Date: Mon Oct 16 22:29:46 2006
New Revision: 117797
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117797
Log:
2006-10-17 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #36 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-08 16:27 ---
Fixed in gcc-4.2
Paul and Erik
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #35 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-08 16:22 ---
Subject: Bug 20541
Author: pault
Date: Sun Oct 8 16:21:55 2006
New Revision: 117558
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117558
Log:
2006-10-05 Erik Edelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Paul T
--- Comment #34 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-10-05 05:00 ---
Subject: Bug number PR20541
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-10/msg00231.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #33 from sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2006-10-03 15:48 ---
The latest patch alloc_comp1002.diff has survived everything I could throw at
it in the last few hours. Go for it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20541
--- Comment #32 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-02 21:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=12373)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12373&action=view)
A patch that fixes test_ab9.f90
You will see the modification in trans-types.c. This is the first bit of the
pa
--- Comment #31 from sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2006-10-02 07:21 ---
For the record: my test application runs to completion with good results
snapshot 20060930 + alloc_comps0929.diff.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20541
--- Comment #30 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-02 04:15
---
alloc_comps0929.diff tests OK for me on i686-linux.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20541
--- Comment #29 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2006-10-02
03:10 ---
Latest version builds fine and shows no regressions on Darwin PPC at -m32 and
-m64.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20541
--- Comment #28 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-29 15:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=12354)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12354&action=view)
Patch that fixes Salvatore's latest
This patch moves the addition of EXPR_NULL for allocatable components to
exp
--- Comment #27 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-28 14:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=12350)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12350&action=view)
The latest version, incorporating all fixes so far.
This latest has an increasingly complete set of testcases an
--- Comment #26 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-25 05:53
---
Paul,
OK here too. i686-linux
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20541
--- Comment #25 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2006-09-25
05:09 ---
Paul,
The current patch builds fine on Darwin PPC and shows no regressions
in the gfortran testsuite at either -m32 or -m64.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20541
--- Comment #24 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-24 17:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=12320)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12320&action=view)
Patch + testcases for allocatable components
This version has all the known issues fixed and includes a number o
--- Comment #23 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2006-09-23
18:41 ---
Paul,
The new patch doesn't allow gfortran to build. I get an error...
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc4-4.1.-20060923/darwin_objdir/./prev-gcc/xgcc
-B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc4-4.1.-20060923/darwin_objdi
--- Comment #22 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2006-09-23
16:24 ---
Paul,
Could you please include the testsuite testcases when you post the
patch? It's rather hard to regression test without those.
Jack
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
--- Comment #21 from paul dot thomas at jet dot uk 2006-09-23 16:18 ---
Created an attachment (id=12313)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12313&action=view)
Latest patch
This version fixes the problem with constructors of structures that have
allocatable components of
--- Comment #20 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-19 16:41
---
*** Bug 29142 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #19 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 17:38
---
Created an attachment (id=12106)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12106&action=view)
Updated patch
Fixes the conflicts with recently committed patches.
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org ch
--- Comment #18 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2006-08-20
14:37 ---
With the latest changes to gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c the current proposed patch
no longer applies. The code which is tangling up the patch is...
***
*** 2664,2683
}
else if (cm->
--- Comment #17 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-10 20:23
---
Created an attachment (id=12060)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12060&action=view)
New version.
Yup, the previous patch wasn't complete (it lacked
libgfortran/intrinsics/move_alloc.c); this o
--- Comment #16 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2006-08-10
13:31 ---
My first attempt to build with this revised patch was unsuccessful...
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc4-4.1.999-20060809/darwin_objdir/./gcc/xgcc
-B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc4-4.1.999-20060809/darwin_objdir/./gcc/
-B/s
--- Comment #15 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-09 21:55
---
Created an attachment (id=12049)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12049&action=view)
Updated patch
Fix the problem reported by Jack.
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #14 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2006-08-06
22:47 ---
The current patch doesn't seem to work any more. I get a compile error on the
current gcc trunk svn
pull...
../../gcc-4.2-20060806/gcc/fortran/parse.c: In function 'parse_derived':
../../gcc-4.2-20060806/
--- Comment #13 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-30 21:38
---
Created an attachment (id=11975)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11975&action=view)
Latest version
Fixed a bunch of problems, added some documentation, and moved MOVE_ALLOC to a
file of it's o
--- Comment #12 from paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr 2006-07-18
14:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=11910)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11910&action=view)
The latest version of the patch
This patch is the last version that I will post until after I retu
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-12 19:41 ---
Created an attachment (id=11871)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11871&action=view)
An unpolluted version of the beta-release patch
I do apologise; the previous diff was relative to a development
--- Comment #10 from paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr 2006-07-12
14:23 ---
Bother! Forget the last test - it is an old, incorrect version. I will post
the right one tonight.
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20541
--- Comment #9 from paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr 2006-07-12
14:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=11867)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11867&action=view)
For discussion, perusal and testing: a beta-release of the TR15581 patch
This patch represents some
--- Comment #8 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-09 21:27 ---
Eric,
when you work on this, watch out for the following test case:
PROGRAM MAIN
TYPE foo
INTEGER, DIMENSION(:), ALLOCATABLE :: array
END TYPE foo
type(foo),pointer,dimension(:) :: mol
ALLOCATE (mol(
--- Comment #7 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-12 19:53 ---
Good luck Erik.
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
GCC host triplet|In
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Additional Comments From erik dot edelmann at iki dot fi 2005-09-29
19:48 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Working on a patch.
Turned out to be much more work than I first thought. I'll leave it for now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20541
--- Additional Comments From erik dot edelmann at iki dot fi 2005-09-27
15:21 ---
Working on a patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20541
--- Additional Comments From post at tillmann-wegst dot de 2005-07-29
08:21 ---
I found that code containing allocatable fields in type statements compiles
without complaints using "g95", so I was a bit perplex when moving to gfortran
and getting the same error as reported here.
Cons
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-22
12:42 ---
This prevents compiling the common iso_varying_string module by Rich Townsend.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
38 matches
Mail list logo
