[Bug fortran/20441] -finit-local-zero is missing from gfortran

2007-09-20 Thread langton at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from langton at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-21 02:40 --- Fixed on trunk as of revision 128643. -- langton at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/20441] -finit-local-zero is missing from gfortran

2007-09-20 Thread langton at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from langton at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-21 02:34 --- Subject: Bug 20441 Author: langton Date: Fri Sep 21 02:34:14 2007 New Revision: 128643 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128643 Log: PR fortran/20441 * gfortran.h : Add init_lo

[Bug fortran/20441] -finit-local-zero is missing from gfortran

2007-08-20 Thread langton at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from langton at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-20 15:07 --- (In reply to comment #9) > Adding -finit-real=nan (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-08/msg00408.html) > is > a real bonus for gfortran. > Any chance to add "-finit-real=snan" to set "Signalling NaN" ? > A SNaN

[Bug fortran/20441] -finit-local-zero is missing from gfortran

2007-08-20 Thread arnaud02 at users dot sourceforge dot net
--- Comment #9 from arnaud02 at users dot sourceforge dot net 2007-08-20 12:28 --- Adding -finit-real=nan (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-08/msg00408.html) is a real bonus for gfortran. Any chance to add "-finit-real=snan" to set "Signalling NaN" ? A SNaN cannot be the result of an

[Bug fortran/20441] -finit-local-zero is missing from gfortran

2007-08-17 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #8 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-08-17 20:15 --- Subject: Bug number PR20441 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg01151.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug fortran/20441] -finit-local-zero is missing from gfortran

2007-06-18 Thread langton at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- langton at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |langton at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org

[Bug fortran/20441] -finit-local-zero is missing from gfortran

2006-11-30 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-30 22:57 --- *** Bug 30029 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug fortran/20441] -finit-local-zero is missing from gfortran

2006-11-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-27 16:47 --- (In reply to comment #5) > > > Besides zero initialization [...] a initialization to a (signaling) NaN > > > (for > > > complex, real) would be also nice to find uninitialized variables. > > > > Why use -Wuninitial

[Bug fortran/20441] -finit-local-zero is missing from gfortran

2006-11-27 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-27 16:02 --- > > Besides zero initialization [...] a initialization to a (signaling) NaN > > (for > > complex, real) would be also nice to find uninitialized variables. > > Why use -Wuninitialize will warn about those cases (tho

[Bug fortran/20441] -finit-local-zero is missing from gfortran

2006-08-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-21 01:38 --- (In reply to comment #3) > Besides zero initialization (of Real, complex, integer, (what about > logical?)), > a initialization to a (signaling) NaN (for complex, real) would be also nice > to > find uninitialized

[Bug fortran/20441] -finit-local-zero is missing from gfortran

2006-08-20 Thread tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
--- Comment #3 from tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de 2006-08-20 20:51 --- Besides zero initialization (of Real, complex, integer, (what about logical?)), a initialization to a (signaling) NaN (for complex, real) would be also nice to find uninitialized variables. --

[Bug fortran/20441] -finit-local-zero is missing from gfortran

2006-02-07 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-07 12:48 --- *** Bug 26150 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/20441] -finit-local-zero is missing from gfortran

2005-03-14 Thread dir at lanl dot gov
--- Additional Comments From dir at lanl dot gov 2005-03-14 18:05 --- This option is needed with most codes decended from main frame codes because almost all compiliers for the main frames did something like "-finit-local-zero" by default. The widely used suite of finite element codes fro

[Bug fortran/20441] -finit-local-zero is missing from gfortran

2005-03-12 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-03-