--- Additional Comments From tow21 at cam dot ac dot uk 2005-04-12 14:46
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Fatal I/O error for an extension that everybody agrees on? Wahoo! I'm not >
> sure any compiler does that...
But "everyone" doesn't agree on it. Otherwise it would be standard, no
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-12
14:31 ---
Fatal I/O error for an extension that everybody agrees on? Wahoo! I'm not sure
any compiler does that...
In my mind, being pedantic (that is, issuing fatal errors) makes sense at
compile-time, but it is v
--- Additional Comments From tow21 at cam dot ac dot uk 2005-04-12 13:18
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> OK. I have a patch to make $ work, I'll add a warning when this is possible
at
> compile-time (I don't think we want to have a warning at runtime, especially
> since there is g
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-12
13:04 ---
OK. I have a patch to make $ work, I'll add a warning when this is possible at
compile-time (I don't think we want to have a warning at runtime, especially
since there is general agreement on this extensio
