--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-21 08:41
---
Works on both the 4.0 branch and the mainline. Testcase forthcoming.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-01-22
06:19 ---
The problem is in the main program
type(objA),target :: oa
type(objB),target :: ob
call new(oa,1)
call new(ob,oa,2)
call print(ob)
call print(getOa(ob)) !
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-01-
--- Additional Comments From pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-21
14:57 ---
My bad, this is in fact legal and well defined.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|RES
--- Additional Comments From pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-21
14:48 ---
Testcase invokes undefined behaviour.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-01/msg00234.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-01-21
13:03 ---
Confirmed on Cygwin and RH9
In an attempt to reduce this a bit, I have produced a slightly more startling
error:
$ cat point.f90
module mpoint
type :: mytype
integer :: i
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Known to fail||4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=