[Bug fortran/19260] & not required when splitting a token in continuation

2006-10-05 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #9 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-10-05 17:34 --- Subject: Bug number PR19260 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-10/msg00255.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug fortran/19260] & not required when splitting a token in continuation

2006-10-02 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 04:11 --- Fixed on 4.2 -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Statu

[Bug fortran/19260] & not required when splitting a token in continuation

2006-10-02 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 04:10 --- Subject: Bug 19260 Author: jvdelisle Date: Tue Oct 3 04:09:49 2006 New Revision: 117385 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117385 Log: 2006-10-02 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Bug fortran/19260] & not required when splitting a token in continuation

2006-10-02 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-03 03:58 --- Subject: Bug 19260 Author: jvdelisle Date: Tue Oct 3 03:58:20 2006 New Revision: 117384 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117384 Log: 2006-10-02 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR f

[Bug fortran/19260] & not required when splitting a token in continuation

2006-09-19 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #5 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-09-20 02:45 --- Subject: Bug number PR19260 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-09/msg00854.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug fortran/19260] & not required when splitting a token in continuation

2006-03-08 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-09 06:59 --- I will see if I can fix this. I fear some serious messing with all the matching routines may be required if it can not be handled in scanner.c -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What

[Bug fortran/19260] & not required when splitting a token in continuation

2006-01-07 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-08 06:00 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Isn't this a dup of bug 19101? No but it is related to it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19260

[Bug fortran/19260] & not required when splitting a token in continuation

2005-04-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-08 21:00 --- Isn't this a dup of bug 19101? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19260

[Bug fortran/19260] & not required when splitting a token in continuation

2005-01-05 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-05 18:10 --- Confirmed. See sec. 3.3.1.3.1. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED