--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-15 10:16
---
Fixing as FIXED: I think the -fpack-derived option is used for this very
purpose.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-06 13:15
---
Maybe I'm completely off, but isn't the -fpack-derived option what is needed to
play with this padding? (it's hard for me to tell exactly, because I don't
really read assembly) If so, could we close the PR?
--
--- Additional Comments From Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de 2004-12-06
08:37 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Alternatively, do other compilers omit padding in sequence types?
ifort does so, unless the '-pad' option is given:
http://www.intel.com/software/products/compilers/flin/docs
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-05 20:47
---
Can you point to a part in the standard which supports this claim? Looking
through it I didn't see anything supporting this claim.
Alternatively, do other compilers omit padding in sequence types? In this case
