--- Additional Comments From pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-29
17:48 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-29
17:46 ---
Subject: Bug 18565
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-01-29 17:46:35
Modified files:
gcc/fortran: ChangeLog check.c intrinsic.c intrins
--- Additional Comments From sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot
edu 2005-01-27 21:55 ---
New patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg02076.html.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18565
--- Additional Comments From sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot
edu 2005-01-27 03:23 ---
FX,
The first of errors with COS() and friends is caused by marking
DCOS as GFC_STD_F77, which apparent is not a subset of GFC_STD_F95.
You did not show the code that gives the second set
--- Additional Comments From coudert at clipper dot ens dot fr 2005-01-26
19:23 ---
Compiling with -std=f95, you can also get these errors:
Error: Type of argument 'x' in call to 'cos' at (1) should be REAL(4), not
COMPLEX(8)
Error: Type of argument 'x' in call to 'exp' at (1) should be
--- Additional Comments From coudert at clipper dot ens dot fr 2005-01-26
09:08 ---
The same bug happens with aimag (and, as far as I can see, for the same
reasons):
$ cat a.f90
program bug
implicit none
complex(8) x
write(*,*) aimag(x)
end
$ gfortran -std=f95 a.f90
In file
--- Additional Comments From sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot
edu 2005-01-23 18:16 ---
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-01/msg00284.html
for a patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18565
--- Additional Comments From toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
2004-11-24 00:33 ---
Subject: Re: gfortran: CONJG: false error message about
standard violation
sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From sgk at troutmask dot apl dot
--- Additional Comments From toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
2004-11-24 00:26 ---
Subject: Re: gfortran: CONJG: false error message about
standard violation
sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From sgk at troutmask dot apl dot
--- Additional Comments From sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot
edu 2004-11-22 04:19 ---
Toon,
I take it back. The code as written is correct. DCONJG is not
listed in "13.6 Specific names for standard intrinsic functions"
of the current standard. It you change the code, the
--- Additional Comments From sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot
edu 2004-11-22 01:43 ---
Toon, Don't you have commit access to the tree? You can fix this
under the "obvious" rule.
--
steve
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18565
--- Additional Comments From toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
2004-11-20 12:03 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> z2 = conjg (z1)
>1
> Error: Type of argument 'z' in call to 'conjg' at (1) should be COMPLEX(4),
> not
> COMPLEX(8)
Yep, I think this in intrinsic.c:
ad
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-19
15:19 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
E
13 matches
Mail list logo
