--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-13 04:25 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1 - see #5
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr 2006-05-11
15:54 ---
> I think what is happening is that lbound's type is becoming a scalar and not
> > an array with size of 1.
I believe that I fixed this with either the bounds scalarization patch or some
of the work on
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-08 05:53 ---
Lahey's says:
2317-S: "SOURCE.F90", line 5, column 3: Shape of arrays on left and right
sides of assignment do not conform.
I think what is happening is that lbound's type is becoming a scalar and not an
array wi
--- Additional Comments From rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-13
08:34 ---
After the patch for 18899, this now works for:
program main
implicit none
real :: a(0:9)
integer :: bn(10)
bn(1:1) = lbound(a)
print *, bn(1)
end program main
but like FX says, we probably ought
